vs.
Volvo XC60 IINissan X-Trail IV SUV Tekna is 4680 mm long, 2065 mm wide (with side mirrors) and 1725 mm high, whereas Volvo XC60 II SUV T8 R-Design is 4688 mm long (8 mm longer than Nissan X-Trail IV), 2117 mm wide (with side mirrors) (52 mm wider than Nissan X-Trail IV) and 1653 mm high (72 mm lower than Nissan X-Trail IV).
Nissan X-Trail IV SUV Tekna has 7 seats, while Volvo XC60 II SUV T8 R-Design has 5 seats.
Both models, Nissan X-Trail IV SUV Tekna and Volvo XC60 II SUV T8 R-Design, have a top speed of 180 km/h.
Nissan X-Trail IV SUV Tekna has a fuel tank capacity of 55 l, whereas the fuel tank capacity of Volvo XC60 II SUV T8 R-Design is 71 l.
Nissan X-Trail IV SUV Tekna has a standard boot capacity of 485 l, whereas the standard boot capacity of Volvo XC60 II SUV T8 R-Design is 505 l.
The presented model Nissan X-Trail IV SUV Tekna has an engine power of 213 HP, while the engine power of Volvo XC60 II SUV T8 R-Design is 197 HP.
Discover the best way to compare Nissan X-Trail and Volvo XC60 with Carshow360.net's innovative comparison modes. Our platform offers five exterior comparison modes and three interior comparison modes, ensuring you get a detailed view of these vehicles from every angle.
In addition to visual comparisons, Carshow360.net provides a detailed comparison of technical data for Nissan X-Trail and Volvo XC60. Understand the differences in sizes, engine performance, fuel efficiency, safety features, and more.
Choose Carshow360.net for an unbiased, detailed, and visually engaging comparison of Nissan X-Trail and Volvo XC60. Our unique comparison modes ensure you have all the information needed to make an informed decision. Visit us today to start comparing!