EN
360°
Details
Colors
Frames
Compare

Nissan X-TrailT33 IV
SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE [22-]

Ford PumaII FL2024 BX726
SUV ST Line X [19-]

Ford PumaIBRM SamarIBRM SamarNissan X-TrailIBRM SamarIBRM Samar
Play
Model info
Opacity
Position

Nissan X-Trail T33 IV

vs.

Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726

Arguments for
Nissan X-Trail (T33 IV)
Nissan X-Trail (T33 IV) Ford Puma (II FL2024 BX726)

Number of seats+27 vs. 5
Wheelbase +117mm2705mm vs. 2588mm
Ground clearance +46mm210mm vs. 164mm
Engine system power +8KM163KM vs. 155KM
Gross vehicle weight +455kg2285kg vs. 1830kg
Standard boot capacity +29L485L vs. 456L
Fuel tank capacity +13L55L vs. 42L

specs

Body
Dimensions
Weights
Transmission
Performance
Emission
Nissan X-Trail (T33 IV)
Ford Puma (II FL2024 BX726)
Body type
SUV SUV
Number of doors
5 5
Number of seats
7 5

Frequently asked questions

What is the engine power of Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE compared to Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X?

The presented model Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE has an engine power of 163 HP, while the engine power of Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X is 155 HP.

Is Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE bigger than Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X?

Yes, in terms of dimensions, Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE is bigger than Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X.

How long does Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE take to reach 100km/h compared to Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X?

The presented model Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE accelerates to 100km/h in 9.6 s, whereas Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X takes 8.7 s.

What is the fuel tank capacity of Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE compared to Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X?

Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE has a fuel tank capacity of 55 l, whereas the fuel tank capacity of Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X is 42 l.

Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE vs. Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X - what are their dimensions?

Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE is 4680 mm long, 2065 mm wide (with side mirrors) and 1725 mm high, whereas Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X is 4207 mm long (473 mm shorter than Nissan X-Trail T33 IV), 1930 mm wide (with side mirrors) (135 mm less than Nissan X-Trail T33 IV) and 1534 mm high (191 mm lower than Nissan X-Trail T33 IV).

What is the top speed of Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE compared to Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X?

Both models, Nissan X-Trail T33 IV SUV Tekna e-POWER e-4ORCE and Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 SUV ST Line X, have a top speed of 200 km/h.

Visual comparison of Nissan X-Trail T33 IV vs Ford Puma II FL2024 BX726 : A Comprehensive Guide on Carshow360.net

Discover the best way to compare Nissan X-Trail and Ford Puma with Carshow360.net's innovative comparison modes. Our platform offers five exterior comparison modes and three interior comparison modes, ensuring you get a detailed view of these vehicles from every angle.

Exterior comparison modes:

  1. Phantom Effect: Witness a seamless transition between Nissan X-Trail and Ford Puma, as if they merge into one. This mode provides a unique overlay view, allowing you to spot the subtlest design differences at a glance.
  2. Face to Face: Position Nissan X-Trail and Ford Puma side by side for a direct comparison. This mode highlights contrasting features, from body shapes to headlight designs.
  3. PhotoZipper: Our PhotoZipper mode lets you "zip" through images of Nissan X-Trail and Ford Puma. Drag the slider across the photo to reveal a split view, offering a dynamic way to compare their designs.
  4. Details: Zoom into specific features of Nissan X-Trail and Ford Puma. This mode is perfect for scrutinizing finer elements like grille patterns, wheel designs, and paint finishes.
  5. TriView: TriView offers a comprehensive view of each car from three perspectives: front, side, and rear. Adjust the opacity to overlay these images, making it easier to notice differences in body shapes and overall design.

Interior comparison modes:

  1. Face to Face: Similar to the exterior mode, this places the interiors of Nissan X-Trail and Ford Puma side by side. Compare dashboard layouts, seating arrangements, and more.
  2. PhotoZipper: Slide between the interior shots of both cars. This interactive tool is excellent for examining differences in cabin space, upholstery, and instrument panels.
  3. Details: Focus on specific interior features. Whether it's infotainment systems or steering wheel designs, this mode allows for close-up comparisons.

Technical Data Comparison:

In addition to visual comparisons, Carshow360.net provides a detailed comparison of technical data for Nissan X-Trail and Ford Puma. Understand the differences in sizes, engine performance, fuel efficiency, safety features, and more.


Choose Carshow360.net for an unbiased, detailed, and visually engaging comparison of Nissan X-Trail and Ford Puma. Our unique comparison modes ensure you have all the information needed to make an informed decision. Visit us today to start comparing!