EN
360° car viewsBrands
360°
Details
Colors
Frames
Compare

Ford PumaII BX726
 SUV ST-Line X [19-]

Skoda FabiaIV
 Hatchback Monte Carlo [21-]

Skoda FabiaIBRM SamarIBRM SamarFord PumaIBRM SamarIBRM Samar
Play
Model info
Opacity
Position

Ford Puma II BX726

vs.

Skoda Fabia IV

Arguments for
Ford Puma (II BX726)
Ford Puma (II BX726) Skoda Fabia (IV)

Wheelbase +24mm2588mm vs. 2564mm
Turning circle -0.1m10.3m vs. 10.4m
Engine system power +5KM155KM vs. 150KM
Gross vehicle weight +160kg1830kg vs. 1670kg
Standard boot capacity +76L456L vs. 380L
Fuel tank capacity +2L42L vs. 40L
CO2 emission level -1g/km128g/km vs. 129g/km

specs

Body
Dimensions
Weights
Transmission
Performance
Emission
Ford Puma (II BX726)
Skoda Fabia (IV)
Тып кузава
SUV (красовер) Хэтчбэк
Number of doors
5 5
Number of seats
5 5

Similar comparisons

Dacia SanderoSEAT Arona
III FL2022Dacia Sandero Hatchback Stepway Extreme [21-]
FL2021SEAT Arona SUV Marina [17-]
Opel CorsaOpel Corsa
F FL2023Opel Corsa Hatchback GS [19-]
F FL2023Opel Corsa Hatchback GS [19-]
Dacia SanderoCitroen C3 Aircross
III FL2022Dacia Sandero Hatchback Stepway Extreme [21-]
FL2021Citroen C3 Aircross SUV Plus [17-]
Peugeot 2008Nissan Juke
II FL2023Peugeot 2008 SUV GT [19-]
II FL2024Nissan Juke SUV N-Sport [19-]
Nissan JukeSuzuki Swift
II FL2024Nissan Juke SUV N-Sport [19-]
VIISuzuki Swift Hatchback Elegance [24-]
Suzuki SwiftOpel Corsa
VIISuzuki Swift Hatchback Elegance [24-]
F FL2023Opel Corsa Hatchback GS [19-]
Citroen C3 AircrossMazda2
FL2021Citroen C3 Aircross SUV Plus [17-]
IV FL2023Mazda2 Hatchback Homura Plus [22-]
Opel CorsaPeugeot 2008
F FL2023Opel Corsa Hatchback GS [19-]
II FL2023Peugeot 2008 SUV GT [19-]
SEAT AronaSuzuki Vitara
FL2021SEAT Arona SUV Marina [17-]
FL2024Suzuki Vitara SUV Elegance [15-]
SEAT AronaMazda2
FL2021SEAT Arona SUV Marina [17-]
IV FL2023Mazda2 Hatchback Homura Plus [22-]
Suzuki VitaraSuzuki Swift
FL2024Suzuki Vitara SUV Elegance [15-]
VIISuzuki Swift Hatchback Elegance [24-]
Nissan JukeMazda2
II FL2024Nissan Juke SUV N-Sport [19-]
IV FL2023Mazda2 Hatchback Homura Plus [22-]
SEAT AronaNissan Juke
FL2021SEAT Arona SUV Marina [17-]
II FL2024Nissan Juke SUV N-Sport [19-]
Peugeot 2008Mazda2
II FL2023Peugeot 2008 SUV GT [19-]
IV FL2023Mazda2 Hatchback Homura Plus [22-]
Suzuki VitaraOpel Corsa
FL2024Suzuki Vitara SUV Elegance [15-]
F FL2023Opel Corsa Hatchback GS [19-]

Frequently asked questions

What is the top speed of Ford Puma II BX726 SUV ST-Line X compared to Skoda Fabia IV Hatchback Monte Carlo?

The top speed of Ford Puma II BX726 SUV ST-Line X is 200 km/h, while the top speed of Skoda Fabia IV Hatchback Monte Carlo is 222 km/h.

What is the engine power of Ford Puma II BX726 SUV ST-Line X compared to Skoda Fabia IV Hatchback Monte Carlo?

The presented model Ford Puma II BX726 SUV ST-Line X has an engine power of 155 HP, while the engine power of Skoda Fabia IV Hatchback Monte Carlo is 150 HP.

Ford Puma II BX726 SUV ST-Line X vs. Skoda Fabia IV Hatchback Monte Carlo - what are their dimensions?

Ford Puma II BX726 SUV ST-Line X is 4207 mm long, 1930 mm wide (with side mirrors) and 1534 mm high, whereas Skoda Fabia IV Hatchback Monte Carlo is 4108 mm long (99 mm shorter than Ford Puma II BX726), 1954 mm wide (with side mirrors) (24 mm wider than Ford Puma II BX726) and 1459 mm high (75 mm lower than Ford Puma II BX726).

Visual comparison of Ford Puma II BX726 vs Skoda Fabia IV : A Comprehensive Guide on Carshow360.net

Discover the best way to compare Ford Puma and Skoda Fabia with Carshow360.net's innovative comparison modes. Our platform offers five exterior comparison modes and three interior comparison modes, ensuring you get a detailed view of these vehicles from every angle.

Exterior comparison modes:

  1. Phantom Effect: Witness a seamless transition between Ford Puma and Skoda Fabia, as if they merge into one. This mode provides a unique overlay view, allowing you to spot the subtlest design differences at a glance.
  2. Face to Face: Position Ford Puma and Skoda Fabia side by side for a direct comparison. This mode highlights contrasting features, from body shapes to headlight designs.
  3. PhotoZipper: Our PhotoZipper mode lets you "zip" through images of Ford Puma and Skoda Fabia. Drag the slider across the photo to reveal a split view, offering a dynamic way to compare their designs.
  4. Details: Zoom into specific features of Ford Puma and Skoda Fabia. This mode is perfect for scrutinizing finer elements like grille patterns, wheel designs, and paint finishes.
  5. TriView: TriView offers a comprehensive view of each car from three perspectives: front, side, and rear. Adjust the opacity to overlay these images, making it easier to notice differences in body shapes and overall design.

Interior comparison modes:

  1. Face to Face: Similar to the exterior mode, this places the interiors of Ford Puma and Skoda Fabia side by side. Compare dashboard layouts, seating arrangements, and more.
  2. PhotoZipper: Slide between the interior shots of both cars. This interactive tool is excellent for examining differences in cabin space, upholstery, and instrument panels.
  3. Details: Focus on specific interior features. Whether it's infotainment systems or steering wheel designs, this mode allows for close-up comparisons.

Technical Data Comparison:

In addition to visual comparisons, Carshow360.net provides a detailed comparison of technical data for Ford Puma and Skoda Fabia. Understand the differences in sizes, engine performance, fuel efficiency, safety features, and more.


Choose Carshow360.net for an unbiased, detailed, and visually engaging comparison of Ford Puma and Skoda Fabia. Our unique comparison modes ensure you have all the information needed to make an informed decision. Visit us today to start comparing!